Who needs a crankshaft?

I can’t explain it any better than this guy so I’m just pasting the whole article, but chalk this up to some outside of the box thinkers

Axial Vector Engine Corporation (AVEC) announced that on Thursday, September 14, they were able to fire-up and produce power on their prototype engine, the Workhorse 7.1. The great significance is that this is the very first time a diesel engine has ever run using a sinusoidal cam instead of a traditional crankshaft.

I did a little digging online and was surprised I didn’t quickly come across a good description of the Workhorse 7.1 or at least an animation of a crankshaftless, sinusoidal cam engine in action. I believe the basic theory, though, is that instead of converting the linear motion of a piston into rotational motion through a crankshaft, this engine would use a “floating” piston that “rests” on top of a large cam shaft (not to be confused with the cam shafts that are used to open and close the cylinder valves). The shape of the cam is calculated to maximize efficiency and power redirection from the up and down motion of the piston into rotational power to the wheels. If anyone’s got any info or links, I’d love to see it.

In any case, AVEC is expecting the Workhorse 7.1 to get 40 percent better mileage and a 50-80 percent reduction in pollutants when compared to an equivalent traditional engine.

[Source: Axial Vector Engine Corporation]

So normal diesels get about 20-30% better mileage than a comparably sized gasser and this gets 40% better mileage than a diesel so that means it gets…..uhhhh…..a whole hell of a lot better mileage than a gasser!  Also imagine how much smaller and lighter it is.

You must be logged in to post a comment.